ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ATLANTIC OCEAN PRODUCTS INC. v. LETH, (1968)

No. 417

Argued:     Decided: November 12, 1968

292 F. Supp. 615, affirmed.

Thomas H. Tongue for appellants.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of Oregon, and Harold E. Burke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/393/127.html">393 U.S. 127 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 127 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DOOLIN v. KORSHAK, 393 U.S. 127 (1968)

393 U.S. 127

DOOLIN, DBA NATIONAL NOVELTY CO., ET AL.
v. KORSHAK, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 439.
Decided November 12, 1968.

39 Ill. 2d 521, 236 N. E. 2d 897, appeal dismissed.

Owen Rall for appellants.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [393 U.S. 127, 128]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More