GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, (1968)

No. 1261

Argued:     Decided: June 17, 1968

21 N. Y. 2d 152, 234 N. E. 2d 194, appeal dismissed.

Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.


RHODES v. COOK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/392/643.html">392 U.S. 643 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 643 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

392 U.S. 643

RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.

E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.

John F. Wilson for appellee.

Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents. [392 U.S. 643, 644]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More