CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CHAN KWAN CHUNG v. IMMIGRATION AND NAT. SERV., (1968)

No. 637

Argued:     Decided: June 17, 1968

381 F.2d 542, affirmed.

Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Julia P. Cooper for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.


CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/392/642.html">392 U.S. 642 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 642 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT v. UNITED STATES, 392 U.S. 642 (1968)

392 U.S. 642

CITY OF WILLIAMSPORT ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 1401.
Decided June 17, 1968.

282 F. Supp. 46, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall and Harvey Gelb for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al., and Carl Helmetag, Jr., for Penn Central Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [392 U.S. 642, 643]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More