HILLMAN v. FLORIDA

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HILLMAN v. FLORIDA, (1968)

No. 443

Argued:     Decided: June 10, 1968

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and Wallace E. Allbritton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968). [392 U.S. 307, 308]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More