HUNT v. CONNECTICUT

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HUNT v. CONNECTICUT, (1968)

No. 117

Argued:     Decided: June 10, 1968

Certiorari granted; 154 Conn. 517, 227 A. 2d 69, vacated and remanded.

James W. Marshall for petitioner.

David B. Salzman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Connecticut is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968). [392 U.S. 304, 305]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More