SANTORO v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SANTORO v. UNITED STATES, (1968)

No. 1219

Argued:     Decided: June 10, 1968

Certiorari granted; 388 F.2d 113, vacated and remanded.

Robert S. Bailey for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 . See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE WHITE'S dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 138 (1968).

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [392 U.S. 301, 302]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More