PERLA v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

JOHNSON PRODUCTS, INC. v. CITY COUNCIL OF MEDFORD, (1968)

No. 1398

Argued:     Decided: June 10, 1968

353 Mass. 540, 233 N. E. 2d 316, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

David Berman for appellant.

Arthur V. Getchell for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PERLA v. NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/392/296.html">392 U.S. 296 </a> (1968) 392 U.S. 296 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PERLA v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 296 (1968)

392 U.S. 296

PERLA v. NEW YORK ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1407.
Decided June 10, 1968.

Certiorari granted; 21 N. Y. 2d 608, 237 N. E. 2d 215, reversed.

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pro se, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, and Julius L. Sackman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Gardner v. Broderick, ante, p. 273. [392 U.S. 296, 297]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More