VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

VAUGHN v. RODRIGUEZ, (1968)

No. 1149

Argued:     Decided: June 3, 1968

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Boston E. Witt, Attorney General of New Mexico, and Thomas O. Olson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, ante, p. 54.


PEART v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/391/603.html">391 U.S. 603 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 603 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PEART v. CALIFORNIA, 391 U.S. 603 (1968)

391 U.S. 603

PEART v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1445, Misc.
Decided June 3, 1968.

67 Cal. 2d 866, 434 P.2d 609, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [391 U.S. 603, 604]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More