IN RE FISCHER

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

IN RE FISCHER, (1968)

No. 229

Argued:     Decided: June 3, 1968

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

David I. Sindell for appellant.

John T. Corrigan and Frederick W. Frey for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted, the judgment vacated, and the case remanded for further consideration in light of In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.


SKOLNICK v. MOSES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/391/600.html">391 U.S. 600 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 600 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SKOLNICK v. MOSES, 391 U.S. 600 (1968)

391 U.S. 600

SKOLNICK ET AL. v. MOSES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1330.
Decided June 3, 1968.

Affirmed.

Peter S. Sarelas, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. [391 U.S. 600, 601]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More