BROOKS v. BRILEY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BROOKS v. BRILEY, (1968)

No. 1285

Argued:     Decided: May 20, 1968

274 F. Supp. 538, affirmed.

William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Howard Moore, Jr., and Morton Stavis for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Thomas E. Fox, Assistant Attorney General, Edwin F. Hunt, and Robert E. Kendrick for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is also granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 611 .

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.


JACKSON v. NELSON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/391/361.html">391 U.S. 361 </a> (1968) 391 U.S. 361 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

JACKSON v. NELSON, 391 U.S. 361 (1968)

391 U.S. 361

JACKSON v. NELSON, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1446, Misc.
Decided May 20, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [391 U.S. 361, 362]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More