SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. UNITED STATES, (1968)

No. 1159

Argued:     Decided: April 29, 1968

277 F. Supp. 671, affirmed.

Alan C. Furth, Robert L. Pierce, William P. Higgins and G. Clark Cummings for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; Ernest Porter, Dennis McCarthy, E. L. Van Dellen, Walter G. Treanor and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


HOSACK v. SMILEY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/390/744.html">390 U.S. 744 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 744 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HOSACK v. SMILEY, 390 U.S. 744 (1968)

390 U.S. 744

HOSACK ET AL. v. SMILEY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 1196.
Decided April 29, 1968.

276 F. Supp. 876, affirmed.

Melvin L. Wulf for appellants.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and John P. Holloway, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [390 U.S. 744, 745]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More