LAHMAN, v. W. E. GOULD & CO.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FERIS v. BALCOM, (1968)

No. 1101

Argued:     Decided: March 25, 1968

___ Ore. ___, 432 P.2d 684, appeal dismissed.

Robert W. Gilley for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


LAHMAN, v. W. E. GOULD & CO., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/390/458.html">390 U.S. 458 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 458 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

LAHMAN, v. W. E. GOULD & CO., 390 U.S. 458 (1968)

390 U.S. 458

LAHMAN, ADMINISTRATRIX v. W. E. GOULD & CO. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT.
No. 1103.
Decided March 25, 1968.

82 Ill. App. 2d 220, 226 N. E. 2d 443, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Raymond Harkrider for appellant.

Calvin P. Sawyier for appellees W. E. Gould & Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [390 U.S. 458, 459]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More