REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

REED ENTERPRISES v. CLARK, (1968)

No. 1092

Argued:     Decided: March 25, 1968

278 F. Supp. 372, affirmed.

Stanley Fleishman, David Rein and Sam Rosenwein for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/390/457.html">390 U.S. 457 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 457 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN, 390 U.S. 457 (1968)

390 U.S. 457

ORTEGA v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 1163, Misc.
Decided March 25, 1968.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [390 U.S. 457, 458]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More