HETTLEMAN v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LOOKRETIS v. UNITED STATES, (1968)

No. 913

Argued:     Decided: March 11, 1968

Certiorari granted; 385 F.2d 487, vacated and remanded.

Maurice J. Walsh for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , and Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.


HETTLEMAN v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/390/338.html">390 U.S. 338 </a> (1968) 390 U.S. 338 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HETTLEMAN v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE, 390 U.S. 338 (1968)

390 U.S. 338

HETTLEMAN ET AL. v. CHICAGO LAW INSTITUTE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 961.
Decided March 11, 1968.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Julius L. Sherwin for appellants.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, John J. O'Toole, Assistant Attorney General, John J. Stamos, Edward J. Hladis and Ronald Butler for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [390 U.S. 338, 339]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More