I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

I. M. AMUSEMENT CORP. v. OHIO, (1968)

No. 260

Argued:     Decided: January 15, 1968

Reversed.

Allen Brown for appellant.

Melvin G. Rueger and Calvin W. Prem for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE concurs on the ground that evidence of contemporary community standards was excluded at trial.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 .


BAXTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/389/573.html">389 U.S. 573 </a> (1968) 389 U.S. 573 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BAXTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, 389 U.S. 573 (1968)

389 U.S. 573

BAXTER ET AL. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 858.
Decided January 15, 1968.

426 Pa. 240, 231 A. 2d 151, appeal dismissed.

Jacob J. Kilimnik for appellants.

Frank J. Pfizenmayer and Levy Anderson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [389 U.S. 573, 574]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More