JAMES v. GILMORE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

JAMES v. GILMORE, (1968)

No. 850

Argued:     Decided: January 15, 1968

274 F. Supp. 75, affirmed.

Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Assistant Attorney General, and J. C. Davis, W. O. Shultz II and James C. McCoy, Assistant Attorneys General, and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellants.

David R. Richards for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SCHOOL COMM., CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/389/572.html">389 U.S. 572 </a> (1968) 389 U.S. 572 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHOOL COMM., CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 389 U.S. 572 (1968)

389 U.S. 572

SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF CITY OF BOSTON v. BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 759.
Decided January 15, 1968.

352 Mass. 693, 227 N. E. 2d 729, appeal dismissed.

John W. White for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [389 U.S. 572, 573]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More