RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RANDOLPH v. UNITED STATES, (1968)

No. 879

Argued:     Decided: January 15, 1968

274 F. Supp. 200, affirmed.

Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., pro se, and Jerry Dee Moize for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Jack H. Weiner for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


DINIS v. VOLPE, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/389/570.html">389 U.S. 570 </a> (1968) 389 U.S. 570 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DINIS v. VOLPE, 389 U.S. 570 (1968)

389 U.S. 570

DINIS ET AL. v. VOLPE, GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS. No. 882.
Decided January 15, 1968.

264 F. Supp. 425, affirmed.

Edmund Dinis, pro se, for other appellants.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, Howard M. Miller, Assistant Attorney General, and Mark L. Cohen, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [389 U.S. 570, 571]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More