ILLINOIS v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO.

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ILLINOIS v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY R. CO., (1967)

No. 670

Argued:     Decided: December 18, 1967

36 Ill. 2d 585, 224 N. E. 2d 248, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Burton C. Bernard for appellant.

Hugh J. Dobbs, John F. Schlafly, Louis F. Gillespie, Gordon Burroughs, Eldon Martin, Jordan Jay Hillman and Robert L. Broderick for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


HULSHART v. MARYLAND, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/389/427.html">389 U.S. 427 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 427 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

HULSHART v. MARYLAND, 389 U.S. 427 (1967)

389 U.S. 427

HULSHART v. MARYLAND.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
No. 708, Misc.
Decided December 18, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James D. Nolan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [389 U.S. 427, 428]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More