BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LANTZ v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., (1967)

No. 623

Argued:     Decided: December 18, 1967

263 F. Supp. 336, affirmed.

James T. Johnson for appellee Lynden Transfer, Inc.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Douglas Lantz for leave to intervene and for other relief is denied. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/389/426.html">389 U.S. 426 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 426 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 426 (1967)

389 U.S. 426

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 711.
Decided December 18, 1967.

268 F. Supp. 203, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Laidler B. Mackall for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. [389 U.S. 426, 427]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More