HADLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HADLEY v. MASSACHUSETTS, (1967)

No. 1179

Argued:     Decided: June 12, 1967

351 Mass. 439, 222 N. E. 2d 681, vacated and remanded.

Louis M. Nordlinger for appellant.

Elliot L. Richardson, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Willie J. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for further consideration in light of Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent and would affirm the judgment for the reasons stated in MR. JUSTICE CLARK'S dissenting opinion in Camara v. Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S., at 546 . [388 U.S. 464, 465]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More