COBERT v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

COBERT v. NEW YORK, (1967)

No. 21

Argued:     Decided: June 12, 1967

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ephraim London for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals of New York is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. [388 U.S. 443, 444]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More