BLANKENSHIP v. HOLDING

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BLANKENSHIP v. HOLDING, (1967)

No. 1089

Argued:     Decided: May 15, 1967

259 F. Supp. 694, affirmed.

Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional. [387 U.S. 95, 96]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More