LITTLE v. RHAY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LITTLE v. RHAY, (1966)

No. 669

Argued:     Decided: November 14, 1966

68 Wash. 2d 353, 413 P.2d 15, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Francis Conklin for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [385 U.S. 96, 97]  


BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/96.html">385 U.S. 96 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 96 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOARD SATANTA JOINT R. H. SCH. v. HASKELL CTY. PLAN., 385 U.S. 96 (1966)

385 U.S. 96

BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH SCHOOL, DISTRICT NO. 2, ET AL. v.
HASKELL COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 560.
Decided November 14, 1966.

197 Kan. 321, 416 P.2d 791, appeal dismissed.

Dale M. Stucky for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More