UNITED STATES v. OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK, (1966)

No. 277

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1966

Appeal dismissed.

Henry Mark Holzer for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 9, 10]  


UNITED STATES v. OHIO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/9.html">385 U.S. 9 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 9 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. OHIO, 385 U.S. 9 (1966)

385 U.S. 9

UNITED STATES v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 271.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 354 F.2d 549, reversed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More