SPROWAL v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SPROWAL v. NEW YORK, (1967)

No. 825

Argued:     Decided: January 23, 1967

Appeal dismissed.

Carl Rachlin for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 649, 650]  


FEIN v. NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/649.html">385 U.S. 649 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 649 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

FEIN v. NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 649 (1967)

385 U.S. 649

FEIN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 793.
Decided January 23, 1967.

18 N. Y. 2d 162, 219 N. E. 2d 274, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Louis Nizer, Paul Martinson and Bennett Boskey for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More