FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

FLOYD & BEASLEY TRANSFER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES, (1967)

No. 702

Argued:     Decided: January 23, 1967

256 F. Supp. 23, affirmed.

John W. Cooper for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al.; Guy H. Postell for Akers Motor Lines, Inc., et al.; and Harold Hernly, Robert E. Joyner and Ormond Somerville for Alabama Highway Express, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/647.html">385 U.S. 647 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 647 (1967) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, 385 U.S. 647 (1967)

385 U.S. 647

SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 797.
Decided January 23, 1967.

242 Cal. App. 2d 38, 51 Cal. Rptr. 197, appeal dismissed.

Randolph Karr and Alan L. Freedman for appellant.

Roger Arnebergh and Bourke Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 647, 648]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More