BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, (1966)

No. 104

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1966

249 F. Supp. 712, affirmed.

Samuel P. Delisi and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al. James M. Carter for appellee Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/3.html">385 U.S. 3 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 3 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, 385 U.S. 3 (1966)

385 U.S. 3

BUCHANAN ET AL. v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 115.
Decided October 10, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 860, appeal dismissed.

Richard M. Markus for appellants.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [385 U.S. 3, 4]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More