COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER, (1966)

No. 437

Argued:     Decided: October 24, 1966

159 Colo. 262, 411 P.2d 785, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John A. Hughes, Raphael J. Moses and John J. Conway for appellant.

Francis M. Shea, William H. Dempsey, Jr., and John R. Barry for appellees Western Colorado Power Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/22.html">385 U.S. 22 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 22 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, 385 U.S. 22 (1966)

385 U.S. 22

BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 574, Misc.
Decided October 24, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 22, 23]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More