SPIESEL v. ROOS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SPIESEL v. ROOS, (1966)

No. 390

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1966

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Anthony L. Schiavetti for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


BRADFORD v. POSTEL, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/16.html">385 U.S. 16 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 16 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BRADFORD v. POSTEL, 385 U.S. 16 (1966)

385 U.S. 16

BRADFORD v. POSTEL, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 402, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 16, 17]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More