MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CAPELOUTO v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING CO., (1966)

No. 316

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1966

183 So.2d 532, appeal dismissed.

Wilfred C. Varn for appellant.

J. Lewis Hall for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/11.html">385 U.S. 11 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 11 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

MASLOWSKY v. CASSIDY, 385 U.S. 11 (1966)

385 U.S. 11

MASLOWSKY ET AL. v. CASSIDY, CHAIRMAN, ILLINOIS HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES COMMISSION, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 574.
Decided October 10, 1966.

34 Ill. 2d 456, 216 N. E. 2d 669, appeal dismissed.

Albert E. Jenner, Jr., and Thomas P. Sullivan for appellants.

Owen Rall for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. [385 U.S. 11, 12]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More