TREFFRY v. TAYLOR

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

REED v. ILLINOIS, (1966)

No. 282

Argued:     Decided: October 10, 1966

33 Ill. 2d 535, 213 N. E. 2d 278, appeal dismissed.

Mort A. Segall for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/385/10.html">385 U.S. 10 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 10 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TREFFRY v. TAYLOR, 385 U.S. 10 (1966)

385 U.S. 10

TREFFRY ET AL. v. TAYLOR, DIRECTOR OF LICENSES FOR THE STATE OF
WASHINGTON, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON. No. 291.
Decided October 10, 1966.

67 Wash. 2d 487, 408 P.2d 269, appeal dismissed.

Francis J. Conklin for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [385 U.S. 10, 11]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More