GRAY v. ILLINOIS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

GREAT LAKES PIPE LINE CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, (1966)

No. 1240

Argued:     Decided: June 13, 1966

272 Minn. 403, 138 N. W. 2d 612, appeal dismissed.

Hayner N. Larson, Erwin A. Goldstein and Leon B. Seck for appellant.

Robert W. Mattson, Attorney General of Minnesota, Perry Voldness, Deputy Attorney General, and Ralph W. Peterson, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GRAY v. ILLINOIS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/718.html">384 U.S. 718 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 718 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

GRAY v. ILLINOIS, 384 U.S. 718 (1966)

384 U.S. 718

GRAY v. ILLINOIS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 1494, Misc.
Decided June 13, 1966.

33 Ill. 2d 349, 211 N. E. 2d 369, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Elmer Gertz for appellant.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael and Philip J. Rock, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 718, 719]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More