DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS v. TEXAS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

LAMBRIGHT v. CALIFORNIA, (1966)

No. 1408

Argued:     Decided: June 6, 1966

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 434, 435]  


DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS v. TEXAS, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/434.html">384 U.S. 434 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 434 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS v. TEXAS, 384 U.S. 434 (1966)

384 U.S. 434

DOUBLE EAGLE LUBRICANTS, INC. v. TEXAS.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 1177.
Decided June 6, 1966.

248 F. Supp. 515, appeal dismissed.

John B. Ogden for appellant.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender, Lonny F. Zwiener and Robert W. Norris, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co., Inc. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111 , and Pennsylvania Public Utility Comm'n v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 382 U.S. 281 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More