RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

RUTHERFORD v. WASHINGTON, (1966)

No. 1167

Argued:     Decided: May 23, 1966

66 Wash. 2d 851, 405 P.2d 719, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Kenneth A. MacDonald for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 267, 268]  


DAY v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/267.html">384 U.S. 267 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 267 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

DAY v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 267 (1966)

384 U.S. 267

DAY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA. No. 1086.
Decided May 23, 1966.

246 F. Supp. 689, affirmed.

Edward J. Hickey, Jr., and James L. Highsaw, Jr., for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Charles W. Burkett, Herbert A. Waterman and Randolph Karr for appellee Southern Pacific Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More