VENABLE v. TEXAS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

VENABLE v. TEXAS, (1966)

No. 1196

Argued:     Decided: May 23, 1966

397 S. W. 2d 231, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

William VanDercreek for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [384 U.S. 266, 267]  


WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/266.html">384 U.S. 266 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 266 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 266 (1966)

384 U.S. 266

WYLAN v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. No. 991.
Decided May 23, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ronald H. Bonaparte and David A. Binder for appellant.

Byron B. Gentry for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More