IZZO v. EYMAN

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE, (1966)

No. 1112

Argued:     Decided: May 16, 1966

244 F. Supp. 808, affirmed.

L. Frederick Paul for appellants.

James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


IZZO v. EYMAN, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/209.html">384 U.S. 209 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 209 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

IZZO v. EYMAN, 384 U.S. 209 (1966)

384 U.S. 209

IZZO v. EYMAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 869, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and James S. Tegart, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona is reversed. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 . [384 U.S. 209, 210]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More