BAER v. NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BAER v. NEW YORK, (1966)

No. 1077

Argued:     Decided: May 2, 1966

Appeal dismissed.

Isadore Greenberg for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/384/154.html">384 U.S. 154 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, 384 U.S. 154 (1966)

384 U.S. 154

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. [384 U.S. 154, 155]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More