COUNTY BOARD, ELECTION, MONROE CTY. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

PUGACH v. NEW YORK, (1966)

No. 131

Argued:     Decided: March 21, 1966

Appeal dismissed.

Petitioner pro se.

Isidore Dollinger and Bertram R. Gelfand for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [383 U.S. 575, 576]  


COUNTY BOARD, ELECTION, MONROE CTY. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/383/575.html">383 U.S. 575 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 575 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

COUNTY BOARD, ELECTION, MONROE CTY. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 575 (1966)

383 U.S. 575

COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTION OF MONROE COUNTY, NEW YORK, ET AL. v.
UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1040.
Decided March 21, 1966.

248 F. Supp. 316, appeal dismissed.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Jean M. Coon, Assistant Attorney General, Ruth Kessler Toch, Acting Solicitor General, and William A. Stevens for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Swift & Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111 ; Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 382 U.S. 281 .

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More