UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

CIESIELSKI v. OHIO, (1966)

No. 920

Argued:     Decided: March 7, 1966

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Theodore R. Saker for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [383 U.S. 411, 412]  


UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/383/411.html">383 U.S. 411 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 411 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 411 (1966)

383 U.S. 411

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 868.
Decided March 7, 1966.

245 F. Supp. 561, 570, affirmed.

James W. Wrape, Robert E. Joyner and Reagan Sayers for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.; Paul F. Sullivan for Kenosha Auto Transport Corp., and Donald W. Smith for Commercial Carriers, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More