HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HC&D MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE, (1966)

No. 855

Argued:     Decided: February 21, 1966

48 Haw. 486, 405 P.2d 382, appeal dismissed.

J. Garner Anthony for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [383 U.S. 104, 105]  


NOLAN v. RHODES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/383/104.html">383 U.S. 104 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 104 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

NOLAN v. RHODES, 383 U.S. 104 (1966)

383 U.S. 104

NOLAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 836.
Decided February 21, 1966.

251 F. Supp. 584, affirmed.

Kenneth G. Weinberg and Stewart R. Jaffy for appellant.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More