INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HEMPHILL v. WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION, (1966)

No. 812

Argued:     Decided: February 21, 1966

65 Wash. 2d 889, 400 P.2d 297, appeal dismissed.

Joel A. C. Rindal for appellants.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, Timothy R. Malone, Assistant Attorney General, and H. Eugene Quinn, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/383/103.html">383 U.S. 103 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 103 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS v. DEACON, 383 U.S. 103 (1966)

383 U.S. 103

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL NO. 12, ET AL. v. DEACON.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 841.
Decided February 21, 1966.

236 Cal. App. 2d 302, 46 Cal. Rptr. 11, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Charles K. Hackler for appellants.

Appellee pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [383 U.S. 103, 104]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More