BECK v. MCLEOD

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

BECK v. McLEOD, (1966)

No. 770

Argued:     Decided: January 31, 1966

240 F. Supp. 708, affirmed.

Samuel C. Craven for appellant.

Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. [382 U.S. 454, 455]  


UNITED STATES v. WILSON & CO., INC., <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/454.html">382 U.S. 454 </a> (1966) 382 U.S. 454 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES v. WILSON & CO., INC., 382 U.S. 454 (1966)

382 U.S. 454

UNITED STATES ET AL. v. WILSON & CO., INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 56.
Decided January 31, 1966.

335 F.2d 788, remanded.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States et al.

Howard J. Trienens for respondents American Telephone & Telegraph Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The joint motion of counsel to remand is granted and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in order to permit the entry of a decree of restitution in accordance with the agreement of the parties.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More