WELLS v. REYNOLDS

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

WELLS v. REYNOLDS, (1965)

No. 258

Argued:     Decided: October 18, 1965

238 F. Supp. 779, affirmed.

Jack Greenberg and James M. Nabrit III for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS dissent.


SHAKESPEARE v. CITY OF PASADENA, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/39.html">382 U.S. 39 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 39 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SHAKESPEARE v. CITY OF PASADENA, 382 U.S. 39 (1965)

382 U.S. 39

SHAKESPEARE ET AL. v. CITY OF PASADENA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 281.
Decided October 18, 1965.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellants pro se.

Allyn H. Barber for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the jurisdictional statement is granted.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [382 U.S. 39, 40]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More