SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC R.R. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMM'N, (1966)

No. 676

Argued:     Decided: January 17, 1966

Appeal dismissed.

Thormund A. Miller, Jeremiah C. Waterman and Randolph Karr for appellant.

Mary Moran Pajalich and Hector Anninos for appellee.

Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the City of San Rafael, California, et al. for leave to be named parties appellee is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/370.html">382 U.S. 370 </a> (1966) 382 U.S. 370 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR, CITY OF NEW YORK, 382 U.S. 370 (1966)

382 U.S. 370

SCHILDHAUS v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 732.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Arnold Schildhaus, appellant, pro se.

John G. Bonomi and Michael Franck for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [382 U.S. 370, 371]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More