PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

ATLANTIC GULF & PACIFIC CO. v. GEROSA, (1966)

No. 718

Argued:     Decided: January 17, 1966

16 N. Y. 2d 1, 209 N. E. 2d 86, appeal dismissed.

Richard H. Appert for appellant.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. [382 U.S. 368, 369]  


PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/368.html">382 U.S. 368 </a> (1966) 382 U.S. 368 (1966) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 368 (1966)

382 U.S. 368

PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 556.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Affirmed.

Paul R. Duke and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Neil Brooks, Robert W. Ginnane and I. K. Hay for the United States et al. Leo A. Larkin, Samuel Mandell, Sidney Goldstein, F. A. Mulhern, Arthur L. Winn, Jr., Samuel H. Moerman, J. Raymond Clark and James M. Henderson for appellee Port of New York Authority.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More