CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

NEHRING v. GERRITY, (1965)

No. 614

Argued:     Decided: December 6, 1965

31 Ill. 2d 608, 203 N. E. 2d 402, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [382 U.S. 202, 203]  


CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/202.html">382 U.S. 202 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 202 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL v. ARNEBERGH, 382 U.S. 202 (1965)

382 U.S. 202

CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC COUNCIL ET AL. v. ARNEBERGH ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 583.
Decided December 6, 1965.

233 Cal. App. 2d 425, 43 Cal. Rptr. 531, appeal dismissed.

Leon M. Cooper for appellants.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Harold W. Kennedy, Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Bourke Jones for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More