O'CONNOR v. OHIO

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

O'CONNOR v. OHIO, (1965)

No. 281

Argued:     Decided: October 11, 1965

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

James W. Cowell for appellant.

Harry Friberg for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [382 U.S. 19, 20]  


ALAMO EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/19.html">382 U.S. 19 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 19 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALAMO EXPRESS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 19 (1965)

382 U.S. 19

ALAMO EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 357.
Decided October 11, 1965.

239 F. Supp. 694, affirmed.

Reagan Sayers and Ewell H. Muse, Jr., for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane and Arthur J. Cerra for the United States et al. William E. Cureton for appellees Central Freight Lines, Inc., et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More