REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

HODGES v. BUCKEYE CELLULOSE CORP., (1965)

No. 548

Argued:     Decided: November 22, 1965

174 So.2d 565, appeal dismissed.

George C. Dayton and Joe A. McClain for appellants.

Richard W. Barrett and J. Lewis Hall for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. [382 U.S. 160, 161]  


REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/160.html">382 U.S. 160 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 160 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON, 382 U.S. 160 (1965)

382 U.S. 160

REYNOLDS METALS CO. v. WASHINGTON ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 537.
Decided November 22, 1965.

65 Wash. 2d 882, 400 P.2d 310, appeal dismissed.

DeWitt Williams for appellant.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and James A. Furber and Henry W. Wager, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More