ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

JOBE v. CITY OF ERLANGER, (1965)

No. 62

Argued:     Decided: October 11, 1965

383 S. W. 2d 675, appeal dismissed.

James C. Ware for appellants.

Harry L. Riggs, Jr., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/382/12.html">382 U.S. 12 </a> (1965) 382 U.S. 12 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 12 (1965)

382 U.S. 12

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 84.
Decided October 11, 1965.

233 F. Supp. 718; 247 F. Supp. 308, affirmed.

Herbert A. Bergson, Howard Adler, Jr., Daniel H. Margolis and William K. Unverzagt for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Wright, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerry Z. Pruzansky and Edna Lingreen for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. [382 U.S. 12, 13]  

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More