CALIFORNIA v. HURST

ResetAA Font size: Print

United States Supreme Court

REDMOND v. VIRGINIA, (1965)

No. 1082

Argued:     Decided: June 7, 1965

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John Alvin Croghan for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. [381 U.S. 760, 761]  


CALIFORNIA v. HURST, <a href="http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/381/760.html">381 U.S. 760 </a> (1965) 381 U.S. 760 (1965) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

CALIFORNIA v. HURST, 381 U.S. 760 (1965)

381 U.S. 760

CALIFORNIA v. HURST.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 45.
Decided June 7, 1965.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Reported below: 325 F.2d 891.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Linkletter v. Walker, ante, p. 618.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinion in Linkletter v. Walker, ante, at 640.

FindLaw Career Center


      Post a Job  |  View More Jobs

    View More